Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Margarita Finley's avatar

I think you nailed it that flexibility and dare I say autonomy to do what fits best for your life in that moment is key! Many places I have worked would claim "flexibility" but then have rules in place like not being able to take more than a 2 hour break. I don't necessarily think of balance as having two equal sides, but more as the calm that you feel from adjusting as needed, but have definitely heard some great arguments about how work/life harmony might be a better phrase?

Neal Whitten's avatar

Amanda, you are a good writer. Personal. Vulnerable. Entertaining. Refreshing. I get your point on seeking (or not) work-life balance. However, I would suggest you do have balance because it is different for each of us. Your balance is fluid and multi-dimensional. You have maintained a lot of control over your full-life's activities which is what we all seek. You apparently have learned that you have far more control over your day and your life than I suspect most people realize. I now work for myself but when i worked for a large company for decades, I had less control than I now have. Something I did which few people knew is that I created "me time" of about 1 hour for 80% of my days. This gave me a release which helped me to be "in control" to a large degree. It allowed a freedom to far more enjoy the mix of my job and personal life. My calendar included both work and personal items because I saw the intersection of both to be my life. I never saw work-life balance to be a 50-50 thing to achieve but a collection of many activities whose priorities fluctuated throughout a day, week, year. Thanks for sharing. Great day to you and your readers! Neal

26 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?